Similar to Stuart Greene, Marilyn Cooper stresses the vitality of the reader-writer connection. Rather than listing facts and statistics, both writers aim to create life and engagement within their articles. While Greene stresses “framing” and “scholarly conversation,” Cooper stresses the “web” and the “ecological model.” Though they are not completely identical, both approaches favor a type of overarching, joining structure that links ideas into a working entity. Additionally, like Storey, Cooper recognizes the complexities and instability of the term “culture,” and points out that the “ecological model” is not necessarily an ideal one; however, it is a helpful perspective.
Personally, I find Cooper’s article to be fascinating,
fresh, and enlightening. Viewing writing through an ecological lens opens up
various ideas and approaches to analyzing text. What I favored most about the
approach is that it allows for flexibility while still maintaining a somewhat
organized structure. Writing –like nature – is constantly changing and evolving
to meet the times, and attempting to approach it in a constrictive, rigid way
will not produce the best results. Therefore, I believe that the “ecological
approach” is more effective, and is also a great lens for viewing writing.
Good response.
ReplyDelete