Fans do not just read texts, they continually re-read them. This changes profoundly the nature of the text-reader relationship. Re-reading undermines the operations of what Barthes (1975) calls the ‘hermeneutic code’ (the way a text poses questions to generate the desire to keep reading). Re-reading in this way thus shifts the reader’s attention from ‘what will happen’ to ‘how things happen’, to questions of character relations, narrative themes, the production of social knowledges and discourses. (229)
Fans of The Hunger Games series have developed a
deeper “text-reader relationship” based on the notion that they have spent more
time with the novels, and they develop a relationship of symbiosis. The
reader-fans rely on the series, and the series’ popularity relies on the
readers. As John Storey writes, “Fan cultures are not just bodies of
enthusiastic readers; they are also active cultural producers” (229). Because
of this, the series’ fan culture is not a passive group by any means – they are
constantly creating new materials that keep the popularity of the series alive.
Without the fan base that The Hunger Games has
formed, few of these “productions” would exist, and the series might not have
ever been brought into pop culture’s eye – dominating magazine covers,
tabloids, and countless websites. Henry Jenkins defined the difference between “mundanes”
(non-fan readers) and fans as a variance in passion and participation, and Storey
adds that, “It is not the commodities that are empowering, it is what the fans
do with them that empowers” (230). In this way, The Hunger Games possess
the potential to “empower” its readers, but the fans are the source that
determines how and allows them to become empowering.
No comments:
Post a Comment